≡ Menu

How Visionaries Influence the World


One of the ideas I often discuss with other influencers is whether the longest lasting forms of power and influence come from collaborative efforts or through the actions of “great” individuals. When using the word great it is implied that this individual can influence what happens good or bad. Thus, Stalin, Hitler and Mao would be considered great men, even if they are not good men”.

Many of my associates believe that no matter how powerful a collaborative effort may be it usually takes one person of greatness to implement these ideas.

This way of thinking can be traced, at least in part, to what is known as the  Great Man Theory  (GMT). GMT is a 19th-century idea according to which history can be largely explained by the impact of great men, or heroes; highly influential individuals who, due to either their personal charismaintelligencewisdom, or political skill used their power in a way that had a decisive historical impact. The theory was popularized in the 1840s by Scottish writer Thomas Carlyle.

It seems like a sensible idea and yet there have been many great thinkers who have questioned the validity of the concept. In 1860 Herbert Spencer  the English philosopher, biologist, anthropologist, sociologist, and prominent classical liberal political theorist of the Victorian era formulated a counter-argument that has remained influential throughout the 20th century to the present: Spencer said that such great men are the products of their societies and that their actions would be impossible without the social conditions built before their lifetimes.  Spencer believed that attributing historical events to the decisions of individuals was a hopelessly primitive, childish, and unscientific position.  He believed that the men Carlyle called “great men” were merely products of their social environment:

“You must admit that the genesis of a great man depends on the long series of complex influences which has produced the race in which he appears, and the social state into which that race has slowly grown…. Before he can remake his society, his society must make him”.

— Herbert Spencer, The Study of Sociology[


Carlyle stated that “The history of the world is but the biography of great men”, reflecting his belief that heroes shape history through both their personal attributes and divine inspiration. In his book On Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in History, Carlyle set out how he saw history as having turned on the decisions of “heroes”, giving detailed analysis of the influence of several such individuals including  Muhammed, Shakespeare, Luther, RousseauPericles, and Napoleon, I would also add  Harriet Tubman,  and Susan B. Anthony). Carlyle also felt that the study of great men was “profitable” to one’s own heroic side; that by examining the lives led by such heroes, one could not help but uncover something about one’s true nature.

Along with Carlyle, American scholar Frederick Adams Woods also supported the great man theory. In his work The Influence of Monarchs: Steps in a New Science of History Woods investigated 386 rulers in Western Europe from the 12th century till the French revolution in the late 18th century and their influence on the course of historical events.

This theory is usually contrasted with “history from below“, which emphasizes the life of the legion over the leader, or when an overwhelming wave of smaller events causes certain developments to occur. The Great Man approach to history was most fashionable with professional historians in the 19th century; a popular work of this school is the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition (1911) which contains lengthy and detailed biographies about the great men of history, but very few general or social histories. For example, all information on the post-Roman “Migrations Period” of European History is compiled under the biography of Attila the Hun. This heroic view of history was also strongly endorsed by some philosophers, such as Leon BloyHegelKierkegaardNietzscheSpengler and Max Weber, but it fell out of favor after World War II.

In Untimely Meditations, Nietzsche writes that: “…the goal of humanity lies in its highest specimens”.

In Fear and Trembling, Kierkegaard writes that: “…to be able to fall down in such a way that the same second it looks as if one were standing and walking, to transform the leap of life into a walk, absolutely to express the sublime and the pedestrian—that only these knights of faith can do—this is the one and only prodigy.”

Hegel, proceeding from providentialist theory, argued that what is real is reasonable and World-Historical individuals are World-Spirit’s agents. Hegel opined: “Such are great historical men—whose own particular aims involve those large issues which are the will of the World-Spirit.” Thus, according to Hegel, a great man does not create historical reality himself but only uncovers the inevitable future.

Tolstoy‘s War and Peace features criticism of Great Man Theories as a recurring theme in the philosophical digressions. According to Tolstoy, the significance of great individuals is imaginary; as a matter of fact, they are only history’s slaves realizing the decree of Providence.

William James in his lecture “Great Men and Their Environment” underlined the importance of the Great Man’s congruence with the surroundings (in the broad sense), though his ultimate point was that environments and individuals shape each other reciprocally, just as environments and individual members of animal species do according to Darwinian theory.

Among modern critics of the theory of great man, one, Sidney Hook, is supportive of the idea; he gives credit to those who shape events through their actions, and his book The Hero in History is devoted to the role of the hero and in history and influence of the outstanding persons.

Leonid Grinin defines a historical figure (a great man) thus: Owing to his personal features, or to a chance, or to his social standing, or to the peculiarity of the epoch, an individual by the very fact of his existence, by his ideas or actions (or inaction) directly or indirectly, during his lifetime or after his death may have such an influence upon his own or another society which can be recognized significant as he left a noticeable mark (positive, negative or unambiguous) in history and in the further development of society.

So, he concludes that the role of great man depends on a number of factors, not none at all.

In recent years we have come to see that there are many great women who have been swept under the rug and are only now getting their due.

In the last thirty years, the idea of the extraordinary individual as power broker, influencer, and cultural force has returned to the public consciousness through the writing of anthropologist and Joseph Campbell. His influence can be found in his books especially  The Power of Myth as well as the and PBS series of the same title. Campbell has also had a great influence on the narrative George Lucas developed for Star Wars.

   In his book on work of comparative mythology  The Hero with a Thousand Faces (first published in 1949 Campbell discusses his theory of the journey of the archetypal hero found in world mythologies. Merged with the world of technology this is powerful stuff.

Since the publication of The Hero with a Thousand Faces, Campbell’s theory has been consciously applied by a wide variety of modern writers and artists including Lucas.

The Joseph Campbell Foundation and New World Library issued a new edition of The Hero with a Thousand Faces in July 2008 as part of the Collected Works of Joseph Campbell series of books, audio, and video recordings. In 2011, Time placed the book on its list of the 100 best and most influential books written in English since the magazine was founded in 1923.

Here the question is, was Luke Skywalker destined for greatness or did his environment and the factors that surrounded him bring him to greatness?




Listen here as Lewis explain the RealUGuru Project and how we can give up unnecessary struggle through visionary thinking in this insightful interview with award winning journalist Phyllis Haynes about the RealUGuru Project







Winning The Game Of Life: A Primer On Lewis Harrison’s Applied Game Theory


Lewis Harrison founder of the RealUGuru Project Think Tank is a is a life coach, peak performance expert, writer, mentor, content-rich, motivational speaker, and an entrepreneur specializing in problem solving and strategizing  based on game thinking, applied game theory and Game Thinking.

He is the author of over twenty-two books published in five languages.


Don’t forget to tune to the RealUGuru Radio show every Thursday 4-6 PM EST at WIOX 91.3 FM or on your smart device at WIOXRadio.org.

WIOX is a diverse station that broadcasts original programming including presentation from NPR, the BBC, Democracy Now etc.

If you are interested in business success in the 21st Century in the arts or in any other endeavor you need to study with Lewis Harrison. Begin by reading  Lewis’ books.

If you are an entrepreneur you will want to begin with his books on game theory and business success.  Here are two basic ones to start with:



The offerings on RealUGuru.com focus on the application of applied game thinking, gamification, decision science, positive psychology, happiness,  and visionary thinking to solve basic, complex and extreme problems. He is the creator of a free course on business success and human potential.

Here is a short interview with Lewis;




This blog is sponsored by the New York City Chair Massage Company at  www.eventschairmassage.com, supplying stress management services to event and meeting planners throughout the United States